Ano Tithorea (hereinafter Tithorea) is a town in Phocis which sits under the foot of the north face of Parnassos. In the Mycenaean Atlas it is defined as C5152 and it is located at 38.583985° N, 22.668176° E. It has always been a small town of shepherds and farmers and of no particular importance although in Pausanias' time it was the location of the most significant Isis temple in Greece. Nor does it seem to have been of any great antiquity. It was thought to have been founded after the Trojan war but the finds exhibited in the town don't go further back than the Archaic. In modern times it bore the name of Velitza until 1926. More recently it has been eclipsed in significance by the growth of Kato Tithorea which is about 4.5 km. to the NE on the right bank of the Cephissos River.
Sunday, December 6, 2020
Wednesday, November 25, 2020
"We glorify Abraham, but how? We recite the whole story in clichés: "The great thing was that he loved God in such a way that he was willing to offer him the best." This is very true but 'the best' is a vague term."
In my last post I briefly mentioned a hill (C7112) in northern Leros which may or may not have been the site of a temple to Artemis. This temple was supposed to have been the home of some Guinea hens and it had a declared connection to the story of Meleager and his sisters. I wanted to use this post to go over the old myth again. Before I continue I made a lage spreadsheet with the mythemes and sources for this complex tale. My readers should download that spreadsheet before continuing. You can get it safely from Google Drive here. Where Google says 'Open with' just click on that dropdown and select 'Google Sheets'.
Meleager's father was King Oeneus of Calydon in Aetolia and his mother was Althaea. She was from a clan called the Kyretes. Right away we have a snapshot of a patriarchal society with, probably, exogamy requirements, and virilocal/patrilocal residence. In other words, Althaea came from her clan, the Kyretes, to live with her husband among the Aetolians/Calydonians - her husband's clan. Her son, Meleager, was a member of his father's clan but with maternal connections to the clan of his uncles, Althaea's brothers, among the Kyretes. In this way the rules of exogamy and virilocality establish a connection across clans between uncles and nephew. This can often provide a path for recruiting people for some special purpose, as we're about to see.
At Meleager's birth the three fates (the Parcae) appeared and predicted what sort of man he would be. But the last of the fates predicted that Meleager's life would be no longer than a brand that was just then burning in the fire place. Meleager's mother, Althaea, rushed to pull the brand out of the fire and extinguish it in some water. She then placed it in a chest and hid it.
Now one day King Oeneus was sacrificing to Bacchus and to other gods and goddesses; this was presumably during a harvest festival. However he omitted to remember Artemis among his sacrifices. The goddess was angered and sent a giant boar to ravage the land of Calydon. In response Meleager organized a hunting party to kill the boar and, among the members of this party, Atalanta (the girl from Arcadia and sometime hunting companion of Artemis), his uncles, and many others. The uncles were undoubtedly following recruitment rules and were bound to receive a prize of honor when successful.
Ultimately the boar was cornered and Atalanta was first to wound it with an arrow. In the end, though, Meleager killed the boar with his spear. The head and skin of the boar was awarded to Meleager; the custom being to award the skin to the one who killed the animal. But Meleager was in love with Atalanta and gave her the skin in turn as being the first to draw blood. Meleager's uncles were outraged by this breach of traditional hunting rules (although various reasons are given for their ire; it's clear that even our oldest sources don't really understand what's going on). The resentment arose either from the fact that she was not the one to kill the boar or that it was against custom to award the prize (and prize it was) to a woman. Now, before I continue, I draw the reader's attention to the remarks of Celoria that this squabble is "a feature of systematic procedures in hunting cultures where the strictest rules are followed in dividing a slain animal." 
Meleager was outraged that his uncles tried to thwart his decision and so he slew them on the spot. When his mother, Althaea, learned about the death of her brothers she took the brand from the chest where it had been preserved for so many years and threw it into the fire - in this way causing Meleager's death. The conflicting duties that Althaea owes both to her brothers and to her children are dramatized by Ovid in one of his more baroque passages. Her conflicting impulses would have been real enough. Meleager's murder of his uncles immediately ignites a war between the Kyretes and the Kalydonians. And, in an alternative version of the death of Meleager, he actually falls fighting in the war against the Kyretes when the city is burned and the brand is destroyed (if I understand that correctly). At his death, however it occurred, his sisters (known collectively as the Meleagrides) made such a clamor that Artemis converted them into Guinea hens. It was exactly in Leros, at Partheni, that this form of the cult was observed.
Now let's take a look at the original sources and see each author deals with the story elements.
The tale falls into two fundamental types. Type 1 concentrates on the Calydonian Boar Hunt and the death of Meleager through his mother's burning of the magic brand. Type II concentrates on the discord between the Kyretes and the Aetolians and how it arose. This variant also ends in the death of Meleager either through his mother burning the brand, or the destruction of the city by burning, or by direct action on the part of Apollo.
The earliest version of Tale Type I (that I find) is in Bacchylides because even though Homer gives a fine sketch of the Calydonian Boar Hunt and its origin he is really more interested in the inter-clan strife between the Kyretes and the Kalydonians. The point Homer is trying to make is the baleful consequences of a great warrior withdrawing from battle. Bacchylides, on the other hand, is more interested in the magical aspects of the story.
The great fifth-century tragedians, both of whom refer to the Type I version, are Aeschylus  and Euripides . Type I appears in its canonical form in Hyginus' Fabulae both 171 and 174. Hyginus has no interest in the civil strife between the Kyretes and the Kalydonians. Hyginus' version is the earliest I know of to mention the sisters of Meleager being transformed into Guinea fowl. Ovid appears to take his cue from Hyginus with a full-blown treatment of the Type I version including the metamorphosis of the sisters into Guinea fowl along with the reason for that transformation (omitted by Hyginus), namely, their crying and shrieking for the death of their brother.
Statius' Thebaid mentions the story in passing. His interest is only the topos of the anger of women and its terrible consequences. For Dio Chrysostom  it is also just a topos. In this case that of the mutability of external opinion and the folly of resting one's understanding of oneself on some external factor. Meleager's life resting on the integrity of a burning brand under the control of someone else is his example.
Both versions of the tale are laid out in Ps. Apollodorus . This is the only one of our sources to do so. He starts with the birth of Meleager and ends with the metamorphosis of the Meleagrides.
Pausanias lays out a few fragments of the story mentioning the Parcae and the burning brand. He skips the Calydonian Boar Hunt (at least in this connection) and briefly mentions Althaea's causing her son's death through the burning of the brand. In Antoninus Liberalis the story is told in chunks. The death of Meleager is overdetermined, being borrowed from both types 1 and 2.
After Pausanias, and in the wake of the collapse of traditional Greek religion, interest in the story falls off.
The Suda knows the story; at least it gives a definition of the Meleagrides [P]
Why were the Melegrides turned into Guinea Hens? I'll look at that element of the story next time.
 The concept of 'the external soul'. In Thompson  this is theme no. E765.1.2, 'Life bound up with burning brand (torch)'. Also Hartland  205 for the story of Olger (Ogier) the Dane. Theme E765.1.2 is listed on this page.
 Celoria  112, n. 33. Such rules are quite common: see Flannery and Marcus  25 for meat sharing among the Netsilik and, p. 32, among the !Kung. The list could be extended indefinitely. Celoria also reminds us of the story of Mac da Tho's pig from The Book of Leinster. For meat division among the Samoans see Peter Buck  119 ff.
In the scholiast on Oedipus at Colonnus (1375) we read that the sons of Oedipus, Polyneices and Eteocles, sent their father a haunch of a sacrificed animal instead of the shoulder. It is suggested in, e.g. Graves , 12 that this was an 'inferior' part of the animal. More likely (but this is pure supposition) the haunch was a brother's portion rather than a father's portion. If that were true then it would have been a deadly insult; an unwelcome reminder to Oedipus of his actual relationship to Eteocles and Polyneices. And see Huxley  42; also Robert Buck  49.
It is not impossible that these formalized divisions of meat underlie the earliest forms of prestation between subordinate and dominant clans. Meleager's uncles were not outraged over nothing. I discuss such matters in more detail here.
 Ode 5. Online here.
 Il. ix, 527-605. Online here.
 In The Libation Bearers, ll. 602-611. Online here.
 Fragment 520. I cannot find the text of this and what little I know is taken from the OCD, s.v. 'Meleager' which refers to the taking of the prize from Atalanta: " ... when, after he had given the hide of the boar to Atalanta with whom he was in love, they took it away from her ( ...; ultimately from Euripides' Meleager? ... "
 The Thebaid II:410-481. Online here.
 Discourse 67, 'On Popular Opinion'. Online here.
 In the Bibliotheke 1.8.2-3 which is online here.
 Section 10.31.3-4. Online here.
 Antoninus Liberalis, The Metamorphoses, 2, 'The Meleagrides'. Online here. Ant. Lib. epitomized Nicander of Colophon (OCD, s.v. 'Nicander').
 "Meleagri/des.", Suda On Line. Tr. David Whitehead. 9 April 2008. Online here.
Buck  : Buck, Peter H. (Te Rangi Hiroa), 'Samoan Material Culture', Bulletin of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, no. 75. 1930. It can be read here.
Buck  : Buck, Robert. A History of Boeotia. University of Alberta Press. 1979.
Celoria  : Celoria, Francis, The Metamorphoses of Antoninus Liberalis; A Translation with Commentary. Routledge, 1992. ISBN: 9780415068963. Online here.
Sunday, November 22, 2020
The island of Leros, in the Dodecanese, lies between Patmos and Kalymnos.
|Leros is situated between Patmos and Kalymnos|
Simpson and Dickinson tell of an early Bronze Age site discovered on the edge of Partheni Bay which is in the north of Leros as shown on the next map.
|Partheni Bay on Leros|
Simpson and Dickinson characterize the site like this:
"The easternmost of three promontories (collectively named "Ta Poundaria") on the S shore of Partheni Bay in the N of the island was an EB settlement. The site is only 80 m. NNW-SSE by 40 m., but may have been partly eroded by the sea. The sherds found are from jars and pithoi of EB I type. ... "
Where exactly is this site?
|Partheni Bay on Leros with ta Poundaria labelled.|
On this map we see the three promontories called 'ta Poundaria'. They are the easternmost on the south coast of Partheni Bay. The one furthest E I have arbitrarily labelled "Poundaria 1". Its neighbors,Ta Poundaria 2 and 3, lie just to its W.
Let's look at Ta Poundaria 1 in closeup:
Does this satisfy the criteria set out by our authors? Here's what Simpson and Lazenby said about it earlier:
" ... a very low and very small promontory ... with the remains of an L-shaped mole at its north-west tip. The promontory, which is about 80 m. long by 40 m. wide, is the easternmost of the three (named collectively 'Ta Poundaria') in the middle of the south shore of Partheni Bay (the central promontory is even smaller, and the westernmost is the peninsula discussed by Benson where both Ross and Burchner reported tholaria)."(52)
Here Simpson and Lazenby are, confusingly, giving the size of the peninsula as 40 x 80 m. when, in fact, it's the site that's 40 x 80 m. The hypothesized size of the site is thus 3200 m. The actual area of this peninsula is about 29,700 sq. m.
In order to give an idea of the size of the site relative to the peninsula I have drawn a circle with an area of 3200 m. (about 32 m. radius) against a photo of Ta Poundaria 1. I show this circle in the next photo:
|Ta Poundaria 1 with a circle sized to approximately the dimensions of the site.|
A Second Site, C7112
"Parallel and very near the tower on its north side is a small ruined chapel , known locally as Ayia Eirene, built largely with blocks taken from the tower. The small conch - like apse is constructed of brick and concrete , which was covered with plaster on which are traces of wall painting in red, yellow and dark greenish grey paint. The total height of the apse above the present surface is 2.45 m. A clandestine excavation which had taken place recently went down below the obvious level for a floor without revealing any traces of one."
As for the platform itself there is another user-contributed photo that shows it up close and looking W. You can find that photo here: https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-m/1280/18/7c/ac/ae/view-of-temple-of-artemis.jpg
Here is a reproduction of that photo. Here the viewer is looking directly W along the apse end of the nave (center). The platform is to the S (on the left) under the shade of a tree.
The temple that was thought to be here was famous in antiquity as sacred to Artemis. The priests kept Guinea hens here which they advertised as Meleager's sisters, the Meleagrides.
In my next post I will devote more space to the myth of Meleager.
 Simpson and Dickinson  367, 'Partheni: Ta Poundaria etc.'.
 Simpson and Lazenby  52, 'Leros; Partheni'
 Simpson and Dickinson  ibid.
 Bean and Cook  134, 'Leros': " ...; and at H. Eirene, between the bay and H. Georgios, is the ruin of a square tower described and illlustrated by Dawkins and Wace."
 The name confirmed in Benson  17 and n. 48.
Bean and Cook  : G.E. Bean and J.M. Cook, 'The Carian Coast III', Annual of the British School at Athens (52) 'Leros', pp. 58-146. . Especially 134 ff. It is online here.
Benson : Benson Ancient Leros. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina and Eaton Press, Mass., U.S.A. 1963. Online here.
Dawkins and Wace  : Dawkins, R.M. and Alan J.B. Wace, 'Notes from the Sporades, Astypalaea, Telos, Nisyros, Leros', Annual of the British School at Athens (12) 151-174, [1905-06]. esp. Section '4 - Leros', which starts on 172. They include a photo of the base of the tower taken facing approx. W. It is online here:
Simpson and Dickinson  : Simpson, Richard Hope and O.T.P.K. Dickinson. A Gazetteer of Aegean Civilization in the Bronze Age, Vol. I: The Mainland and the Islands. Paul Åströms Förlag, Goteborg. 1979., 'Partheni: Ta Poundaria etc.', pg. 367. Online here :
Simpson and Lazenby  : Simpson, R. Hope and J.F. Lazenby. 'Notes from the Dodecanese II', The Annual of the British School at Athens (65). pp. 47-77. 1970. Online here:
Saturday, June 20, 2020
|The island of Kephalonia|
Wednesday, April 15, 2020
The area of Euboea south of Styra is a wild forested country of zig-zagging ridges. It was not densely populated at any period in antiquity and it remains sparsely populated today. I've been adding find sites in this area to the Mycenaean Atlas by integrating Fachard  and this brought me to an habitation site called Metsiphi.
The site of Metsiphi (no. 4 on the next map) consists of a six-room building and a boundary stone marking the border between the demes of Eretria and Styra. It may be a construction of either the Archaic or the Classical period.
Where is it?
Karystos itself is at the south end of Euboea (F5697). Kliosi* is another name for the ridge on which stands the Acropolis of Styra* (F5654). Stoupaioi is at F5695 and Vatisi is further south at F5696. And yet we still have no definite narrowing for the location of Metsiphi.
|The house at Metsiphi. But which direction are we facing?|
|Floor plan of Metsiphi house from Reber  46, Abb. 3.|
About Metsiphi Fachard says 'The most probable hypothesis seems to us to be that of a farm exploiting the little valley of Haghios Ioannis."(5)
2. Haghios Nikolaos (Acropolis of Styra AND Fortress of Larmena/Armena)
2a. Kiapha Pass (col, Sattel)
3. Koryphi peak (682 m)
4. Metsiphi and Haghios Ioannis
The reproduction of landscape views in Google earth is a good technique that I have used successfully many times in the past and I encourage you who are trying to locate sites from photographs to try it.
Glossary of Place Names at Haghios Nikolaos ridge:
I used the following geographic terms in the specific way explained here:
Ducrey et al. : Ducrey, Pierre and Sylvian Fachard, Thierry Theurillat, 'Les Activités de l'École Suisse d'Archéologie en Grèce 2004', Antike Kunst (48) 112-123. 2005. Online here.